This page is ThaiAngler's public corrections record. Every material factual error corrected on this site is logged here with the date, the affected article, the nature of the error, and what was changed.
Publishing a corrections log is a standard editorial practice that we think matters. Getting things right is more important than appearing to have always been right.
Corrections Log
Format examples
The three entries below are illustrative examples created by the ThaiAngler editorial team at launch to demonstrate the log format and the kinds of corrections this record is designed to capture. They are not third-party corrections — no external reader has reported them. First real reader-reported corrections will be added above these entries as they arrive, in reverse chronological order.
2026-05-04 — Bungsamran Lake: day rate range updated
Source: editorial observation.
Previous text stated the day session fee as "from around 1,200–2,500 THB." Updated to "from around 1,500–2,800 THB" following a review of current venue pricing as posted at the lake. The original range was accurate at time of publication but is no longer current. The article's updatedAt date has been revised accordingly.
2026-04-22 — Krabi charter-operators overview: Phang Nga proxy note removed Source: editorial visit. An earlier version of the Krabi charter overview noted that some operators used a Phang Nga proxy address for administrative reasons. Following a visit confirming that this is no longer the case, the note has been removed and the Krabi charter directory is now linked directly. The original note was accurate when written but was potentially confusing to readers planning Krabi trips, and has been replaced with current information. Logged here for transparency.
2026-03-15 — Gillhams Fishing Resorts: arapaima encounter rate language revised Source: reader correction. A passage in the Gillhams article originally stated that arapaima encounters were a "reliable monthly photo opportunity" for visiting anglers. A reader with recent firsthand experience contacted us to note that this overstated typical catch rates — arapaima encounters at Gillhams are possible and occur with some regularity, but "reliable monthly" implies a certainty that does not reflect typical visitor experience across the full year. The relevant passage has been revised to reflect realistic seasonal expectations. The reader's correction was well-evidenced and consistent with independent information we were able to verify. We thank them for reporting it.
This page was established on 2026-05-06. Real reader-reported corrections will appear above the illustrative launch entries as they arrive.
How We Handle Corrections
What counts as a correction
A correction is a change to published content that fixes a factual error — a wrong species name, an incorrect price, an inaccurate description of a regulation, a misidentified venue location. Corrections are distinct from updates, which reflect information that was accurate when published but has since changed. Updates are noted with a revised updatedAt date and, where the change is significant, a brief note within the article. Updates are not logged here.
How corrections are applied
When a material error is identified, the affected article is edited and a correction note is added at the top of the page with the date and a brief explanation of what changed. The original incorrect text is removed rather than struck through, because leaving it in place risks propagating the error to readers who skim. The correction note records what the original text said. The error and correction are then added to this log.
Minor errors — typos that do not affect meaning, formatting glitches — are fixed silently.
How to report an error
If you have found something on ThaiAngler that you believe is factually incorrect, email hello@thaiangler.com with the article URL and the specific claim in question. Include any source or firsthand knowledge you have that supports the correction. We read every message and follow up on every credible report.
Our standard for acting on a report
We correct errors when the evidence supports it. A reader saying "I think that's wrong" prompts investigation; a reader providing a dated field report, official source, or direct operator confirmation prompts a correction if the evidence is clear. We do not correct content under social pressure absent factual grounds, and we do not remove accurate negative assessments of venues or products because the subject of the assessment objects.
Timing
We aim to process correction reports within 72 hours of receipt. Complex corrections — those requiring re-verification of multiple related claims — may take longer. We will acknowledge receipt of your message and let you know if we need more time.